GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and GeForce Go 7900 GTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Go 7900 GTX outperforms ATI Mobility HD 2600 XT by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1306 | 1171 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 1.07 |
Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Curie (2003−2013) |
GPU code name | M76 | G71 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 14 May 2007 (17 years ago) | 18 April 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 120 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 500 MHz |
Number of transistors | 390 million | 278 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 45 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 5.440 | 12.00 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.1632 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 4 | 16 |
TMUs | 8 | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | large |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 750 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 24 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 12−14
−46.2%
|
18−20
+46.2%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
World of Tanks | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Go 7900 GTX is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Go 7900 GTX is ahead in 20 tests (59%)
- there's a draw in 14 tests (41%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.33 | 0.70 |
Recency | 14 May 2007 | 18 April 2006 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
ATI Mobility HD 2600 XT has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Go 7900 GTX, on the other hand, has a 112.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.