UHD Graphics 750 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.22
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameM72Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40256
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors180 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80020.80
Floating-point processing power0.036 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 750 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and UHD Graphics 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 430 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 2400 or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.