Tesla K20m vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.26
Power efficiencyno data3.62
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameM72GK110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)5 January 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402496
Core clock speed450 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors180 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800146.8
Floating-point processing power0.036 TFLOPS3.524 TFLOPS
ROPs440
TMUs4208
L1 Cacheno data208 KB
L2 Cache32 KB1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB5 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s208.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 5 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

Tesla K20m has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and Tesla K20m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla K20m is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Tesla K20m

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate Tesla K20m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 2400 or Tesla K20m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.