RTX A500 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.18
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM72GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402048
Core clock speed450 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors180 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800113.3
Floating-point processing power0.036 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm

RTX A500 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and RTX A500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 169 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 2400 or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.