Radeon Next vs ATI Mobility 9600 PRO Turbo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 6.0
GPU code nameM10Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 February 2004 (21 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed337 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors76 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Texture fill rate1.348no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed243 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.776 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm

Radeon Next has a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo and Radeon Next. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Next is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
AMD Radeon Next
Radeon Next

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Next on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo or Radeon Next, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.