GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRS300G92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 June 2003 (22 years ago)21 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$160

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3128
Core clock speed300 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors76 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt
Texture fill rate0.646.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs264
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2003 21 July 2008
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm

9800 GT Rebrand has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP and GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 11 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP or GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.