Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand vs ATI Mobility 9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameM9Mars
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2002 (23 years ago)10 January 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5384
Core clock speed240 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed240 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors36 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate0.9616.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5376 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2002 10 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R5 M240 Rebrand has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9000 and Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 13 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9000 or Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.