Apollo Lake GT1 5 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameM9Apollo Lake GT1 5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2002 (23 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5144
Core clock speed240 MHzno data
Boost clock speed240 MHzno data
Number of transistors36 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate0.96no data
ROPs43
TMUs418

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount64 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112.0 (12_1)
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

Apollo Lake GT1 5 has a 971% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9000 and Apollo Lake GT1 5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9000 is a notebook graphics card while Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9000 or Apollo Lake GT1 5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.