GeForce 720A vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1048
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.22
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRC300GF117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2003 (22 years ago)1 July 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores396
Core clock speed300 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz938 MHz
Number of transistors76 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data33 Watt
Texture fill rate0.615.01
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1801 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs216
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 1 July 2014
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

GeForce 720A has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP and GeForce 720A. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 720A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP or GeForce 720A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.