RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated26
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.27
Power efficiencyno data17.47
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM6AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2004 (21 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data18176
Core clock speed144 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors30 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate0.431,423
Floating-point processing powerno data91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs1192
TMUs3568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142
L1 Cacheno data17.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 MB48 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed139 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.112 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 307100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 7000 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 7000 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 7000
Mobility Radeon 7000
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 122 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 7000 or RTX 6000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.