Quadro4 900 XGL vs ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameRS250NV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)19 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2no data
Core clock speed166 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors30 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.52.400
ROPs18
TMUs38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared325 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.08.1
OpenGL1.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 19 February 2002
Chip lithography 180 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility 7000 IGP has an age advantage of 1 year.

Quadro4 900 XGL, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP and Quadro4 900 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 900 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Quadro4 900 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 900 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP or Quadro4 900 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.