UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameM26Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date3 February 2005 (20 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1432
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors120 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate2.800no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed425 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth13.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)DirectX 12_1
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 February 2005 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility FireGL V5000 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V5000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V5000
Mobility FireGL V5000
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL V5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5000 or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.