ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameM24M64
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2004 (20 years ago)1 March 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores66
Core clock speed400 MHz479 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz480 MHz
Number of transistors75 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm80 nm
Texture fill rate1.6001.916
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz392 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s6.272 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2004 1 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 80 nm

ATI Mobility FireGL V3200 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI Mobility X2300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility FireGL V3200 and Mobility Radeon X2300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V3200 is a mobile workstation card while Mobility Radeon X2300 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V3200
Mobility FireGL V3200
ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
Mobility Radeon X2300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 57 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.