Quadro P520 vs ATI Mobility FireGL 7800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.92
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM7GP108
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date29 September 2001 (23 years ago)23 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2384
Core clock speed280 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speed280 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors60 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate0.5635.83
Floating-point processing powerno data1.147 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2001 23 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro P520 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility FireGL 7800 and Quadro P520. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL 7800
Mobility FireGL 7800
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Quadro P520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 101 vote

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.