Matrox Parhelia HR256 vs Matrox QID

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMP (2004)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameMP-A4Parhelia-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 December 2004 (21 years ago)September 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data80 million
Manufacturing process technology0 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate2.0003.200
ROPs24
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCI-X
Length165 mm190 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI2x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.18.1
OpenGL1.51.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Matrox QID and Matrox Parhelia HR256. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox QID
QID
Matrox Parhelia HR256
Parhelia HR256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia HR256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox QID or Matrox Parhelia HR256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.