Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 vs Matrox QID LP PCIe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMP (2004)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameMP-A4Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 December 2004 (20 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology0 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate2.000no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR4
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed300 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.1DirectX 12_1
OpenGL1.5no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2004 15 August 2020

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 has an age advantage of 15 years.

We couldn't decide between Matrox QID LP PCIe and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox QID LP PCIe is a desktop graphics card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox QID LP PCIe
QID LP PCIe
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID LP PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox QID LP PCIe or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.