RTX A500 vs Matrox QID LP PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.24
ArchitectureMP (2004)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMP-A4GA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2004 (20 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed250 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology0 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000113.3
Floating-point processing powerno data7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH60No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2004 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB

RTX A500 has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Matrox QID LP PCI and RTX A500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox QID LP PCI is a desktop graphics card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox QID LP PCI
QID LP PCI
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID LP PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 169 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox QID LP PCI or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.