ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs Matrox Productiva G100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.48
ArchitectureG100 (1998)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameTwisterRV515
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1998 (28 years ago)2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed41 MHz635 MHz
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data27 Watt
Texture fill rate0.042.540
ROPs14
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 1.0 x16
Length150 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSGRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed62 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth496.0 MB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX3.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLNone2.1
OpenCLNoneN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 350 nm 90 nm

ATI X1650 SE has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 288.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Productiva G100 and Radeon X1650 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Productiva G100
Productiva G100
ATI Radeon X1650 SE
Radeon X1650 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 17 votes

Rate Matrox Productiva G100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1650 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Productiva G100 or Radeon X1650 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.