Radeon R9 M385 vs Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated674
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameParhelia-512Strato
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2003 (22 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed200 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors80 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate3.20056.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1656
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCI-XPCIe 3.0 x16
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MBps1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s76.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.1DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.34.4
OpenCLN/ANot Listed
VulkanN/A-
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R9 M385 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT and Radeon R9 M385. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R9 M385 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT
Parhelia Precision SGT
AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon R9 M385

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT or Radeon R9 M385, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.