Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.66
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameParhelia-512Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2003 (23 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed200 MHz1187 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1757 MHz
Number of transistors80 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200168.7
Floating-point processing powerno data5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1696
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 4.0 x8
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

Pro 5500 XT has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT and Radeon Pro 5500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500 XT is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 73 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia Precision SGT or Radeon Pro 5500 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.