UHD Graphics 750 vs Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.17
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameParhelia-512Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2003 (22 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors80 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20020.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XRing Bus
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 750 has a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT and UHD Graphics 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT
Parhelia Precision SDT
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 428 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia Precision SDT or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.