GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs Matrox Parhelia PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10088
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameParhelia-512AD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2003 (22 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed200 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1605 MHz
Number of transistors80 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200128.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.218 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs1680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 4.0 x8
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MBps2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RTX 4050 Max-Q has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia PCI and GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia PCI is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia PCI
Parhelia PCI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Matrox Parhelia PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 120 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia PCI or GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.