GeForce FX 5600 Ultra vs Matrox Parhelia HR256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameParhelia-512NV31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateSeptember 2003 (22 years ago)17 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors80 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate3.2001.600
ROPs44
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XAGP 8x
Length190 mm191 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH601x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0a
OpenGL1.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

Matrox Parhelia HR256 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FX 5600 Ultra, on the other hand, has a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia HR256 and GeForce FX 5600 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia HR256
Parhelia HR256
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia HR256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5600 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia HR256 or GeForce FX 5600 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.