Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Matrox Parhelia DL256

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameParhelia-512Aldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2003 (23 years ago)8 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data13312
Core clock speed200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors80 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2001,414
Floating-point processing powerno data45.26 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs16832
L1 Cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MBps1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH60No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.1N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm

Instinct MI250 has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia DL256 and Radeon Instinct MI250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia DL256 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI250 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia DL256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia DL256 or Radeon Instinct MI250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.