HD Graphics 2000 vs Matrox Parhelia DL256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameParhelia-512Sandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2003 (22 years ago)1 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed200 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors80 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no dataunknown
Texture fill rate3.2008.100
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPs41
TMUs166

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 1.0 x16
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH60No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.33.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 32 nm

HD Graphics 2000 has a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia DL256 and HD Graphics 2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia DL256 is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia DL256
Parhelia DL256
Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia DL256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1438 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia DL256 or HD Graphics 2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.