ATI Radeon X1950 GT vs Matrox Parhelia APVe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1427
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.34
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameParhelia-512RV570
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 June 2006 (19 years ago)29 January 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$140

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors80 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data57 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0006.000
ROPs212
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.52.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Matrox Parhelia APVe 5
Samples: 3
ATI X1950 GT 106
+2020%
Samples: 31

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2006 29 January 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 80 nm

ATI X1950 GT has an age advantage of 7 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia APVe and Radeon X1950 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia APVe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 43 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia APVe or Radeon X1950 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.