ATI Radeon X1300 PRO vs Matrox Parhelia APVe

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1455
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.50
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameParhelia-512RV515
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 June 2006 (19 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors80 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data31 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0002.400
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.52.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Matrox Parhelia APVe 5
Samples: 3
ATI X1300 PRO 84
+1580%
Samples: 54

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2006 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm

Matrox Parhelia APVe has an age advantage of 8 months.

ATI X1300 PRO, on the other hand, has a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia APVe and Radeon X1300 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia APVe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia APVe or Radeon X1300 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.