ATI Mobility Radeon X800XT vs Matrox Parhelia APVe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)no data
GPU code nameParhelia-512M28Pro
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 June 2006 (19 years ago)8 June 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data22
Core clock speed250 MHz6 MHz
Boost clock speedno data480 MHz
Number of transistors80 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate1.000no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR256
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz550 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.1no data
OpenGL1.5no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2006 8 June 2005
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

Matrox Parhelia APVe has an age advantage of 1 year.

ATI Mobility X800XT, on the other hand, has a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia APVe and Mobility Radeon X800XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia APVe is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon X800XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia APVe
Parhelia APVe
ATI Mobility Radeon X800XT
Mobility Radeon X800XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia APVe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon X800XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia APVe or Mobility Radeon X800XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.