GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 32M vs Matrox Parhelia 256 MB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameParhelia-512NV34 B1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 June 2002 (23 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed200 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors80 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.80.8
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 8x
Length175 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0a
OpenGL1.51.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 June 2002 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 MB

Matrox Parhelia 256 MB has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FX Go5200 NPB 32M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia 256 MB and GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 32M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia 256 MB is a desktop graphics card while GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 32M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia 256 MB
Parhelia 256 MB
NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 32M
GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 32M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 11 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 256 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 32M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia 256 MB or GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 32M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.