Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics vs Matrox Millennium G550

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG500 (2001−2005)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameCondorBeema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 November 2001 (24 years ago)6 June 2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed125 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data847 MHz
Number of transistors10 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.256.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (6.0)
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2001 6 June 2014
Chip lithography 180 nm 28 nm

R5E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Millennium G550 and Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Millennium G550 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Millennium G550 or Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.