Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Matrox Millennium G400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameToucanAldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 May 1999 (25 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data13312
Core clock speed125 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors10 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rate0.251,414
Floating-point processing powerno data45.26 TFLOPS
ROPs2no data
TMUs2832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Length150 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount32 MB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLNoneN/A
OpenCLNone3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 May 1999 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 6 nm

Instinct MI250 has an age advantage of 22 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Millennium G400 and Radeon Instinct MI250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Millennium G400 is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI250 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Millennium G400
Millennium G400
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
Radeon Instinct MI250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.