T500 Max-Q vs Matrox Marvel G400-TV

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameToucanTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 May 1999 (26 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed125 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors10 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2579.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs256
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Length150 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 May 1999 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 12 nm

T500 Max-Q has an age advantage of 21 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Marvel G400-TV and T500 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Marvel G400-TV is a desktop graphics card while T500 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Marvel G400-TV
Marvel G400-TV
NVIDIA T500 Max-Q
T500 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Marvel G400-TV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 17 votes

Rate T500 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Marvel G400-TV or T500 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.