T550 Mobile vs Matrox Marvel G200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.14
ArchitectureG200 (1998−1999)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameEclipseTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1998 (27 years ago)May 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed84 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors10 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08106.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.41 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs164
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length150 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed112 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth896.0 MB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 12 nm

T550 Mobile has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Marvel G200 and T550 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Marvel G200 is a desktop graphics card while T550 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Marvel G200
Marvel G200
NVIDIA T550 Mobile
T550 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 20 votes

Rate Matrox Marvel G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 28 votes

Rate T550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Marvel G200 or T550 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.