RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Matrox Marvel G200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated12
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.84
ArchitectureG200 (1998−1999)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameEclipseAD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1998 (26 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data12800
Core clock speed84 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2550 MHz
Number of transistors10 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.081,020
Floating-point processing powerno data65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs1176
TMUs1400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Coresno data100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length150 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 MB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed112 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth896.0 MB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 5 nm

RTX 5000 Ada Generation has a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Marvel G200 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Marvel G200 is a desktop card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Marvel G200
Marvel G200
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 20 votes

Rate Matrox Marvel G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 78 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.