GeForce GT 1010 vs Matrox Marvel G200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG200 (1998−1999)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameEclipseGP108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1998 (26 years ago)13 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed84 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1468 MHz
Number of transistors10 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0823.49
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7516 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs116

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length150 mm147 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed112 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth896.0 MB/s40.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 14 nm

GT 1010 has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Marvel G200 and GeForce GT 1010. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Marvel G200
Marvel G200
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
GeForce GT 1010

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 20 votes

Rate Matrox Marvel G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 531 vote

Rate GeForce GT 1010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.