GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs Matrox G550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG500 (2001−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCondorGT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 2001 (25 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed125 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors10 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data31 Watt
Texture fill rate0.254.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs28
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MBps400 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.53.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2001 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 40 nm

210 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G550 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Matrox G550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 81 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox G550 or GeForce 210 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.