Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs Matrox G550 PCIe

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG500 (2001−2005)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCondorVega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 July 2005 (19 years ago)1 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed125 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1247 MHz
Number of transistors10 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25319.2
ROPs264
TMUs2256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Length112 mm152 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 July 2005 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 64 Nano has an age advantage of 12 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G550 PCIe and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox G550 PCIe
G550 PCIe
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox G550 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.