RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Matrox G550 PCIe

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.95
ArchitectureG500 (2001−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCondorAD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 July 2005 (20 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed125 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors10 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25417.6
Floating-point processing powerno data26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs2192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Length112 mm245 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 July 2005 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 18 years, a 63900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G550 PCIe and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox G550 PCIe is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox G550 PCIe
G550 PCIe
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox G550 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 65 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox G550 PCIe or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.