ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE vs Matrox G550 PCIe

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG500 (2001−2005)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameCondorR420
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 July 2005 (20 years ago)27 April 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed125 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors10 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate0.253.400
ROPs28
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x1AGP 8x
Length112 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.09.0b (9_2)
OpenGL1.52.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 July 2005 27 April 2005
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 130 nm

Matrox G550 PCIe has an age advantage of 2 months.

ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G550 PCIe and All-In-Wonder X800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox G550 PCIe
G550 PCIe
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE
All-In-Wonder X800 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox G550 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox G550 PCIe or All-In-Wonder X800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.