UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Matrox G450 x4 MMS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated916
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameCondorTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 January 2001 (24 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed125 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors10 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate0.25no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount32 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed332 MBpsno data
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012_1
OpenGLNoneno data
OpenCLNoneno data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2001 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 180 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G450 x4 MMS and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 391 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox G450 x4 MMS or UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.