Quadro4 700 XGL vs Matrox G450

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameCondorNV25 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 January 2001 (25 years ago)19 February 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed125 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors10 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.252.200
ROPs28
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 4x
Length150 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MBps225 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s7.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.08.1
OpenGLNone1.3
OpenCLNoneN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2001 19 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 150 nm

Quadro4 700 XGL has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G450 and Quadro4 700 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox G450 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 700 XGL is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Matrox G450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 700 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox G450 or Quadro4 700 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.