Tesla K20c vs Matrox G450 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.16
Power efficiencyno data2.81
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCondorGK110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2496
Core clock speed125 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors10 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25146.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.524 TFLOPS
ROPs240
TMUs2208
L1 Cacheno data208 KB
L2 Cacheno data1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB5 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MBps1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s208.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 28 nm

Tesla K20c has a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G450 LP and Tesla K20c. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox G450 LP is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K20c is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox G450 LP
G450 LP
NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox G450 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 12 votes

Rate Tesla K20c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox G450 LP or Tesla K20c, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.