GeForce GT 240M LE vs ATI Mach 64 GX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameMach64 GXG96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 January 1995 (29 years ago)15 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed10 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data9.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMDDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DB13W3No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLNone3.3
OpenCLNone1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1995 15 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 600 nm 55 nm

GT 240M LE has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 990.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mach 64 GX and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mach 64 GX is a desktop card while GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mach 64 GX
Mach 64 GX
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Mach 64 GX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.