Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics vs Jetson Xavier NX GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010)
GPU code nameGV10BGMA HD
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38412
Core clock speed854 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1377 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate33.05no data
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
Tensor Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Length70 mmno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA7.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Jetson Xavier NX GPU has an age advantage of 10 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Xavier NX GPU and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson Xavier NX GPU is a desktop card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX GPU
Jetson Xavier NX GPU
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 28 votes

Rate Jetson Xavier NX GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 137 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.