GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs Jetson TX2 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP10BTU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2016 (9 years ago)18 June 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256896
Core clock speedno data1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1465 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate23.4489.04
Floating-point processing power0.7501 TFLOPS2.849 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1656
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Length87 mm229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA6.27.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 90 Watt

Jetson TX2 GPU has 500% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 TU106, on the other hand, has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson TX2 GPU and GeForce GTX 1650 TU106. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson TX2 GPU
Jetson TX2 GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 14 votes

Rate Jetson TX2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 294 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Jetson TX2 GPU or GeForce GTX 1650 TU106, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.