RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Jetson Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM20BAD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2019 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1285120
Core clock speed640 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speed921 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate14.74360.0
Floating-point processing power0.2358 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache48 KB5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA5.38.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 20 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 100 Watt

Jetson Nano has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Nano and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson Nano is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Jetson Nano or RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.