RTX A2000 Embedded vs Jetson Nano GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data58.11
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM20BGA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release dateMarch 2019 (7 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282560
Core clock speed640 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed921 MHz1177 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology20 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate14.7494.16
Floating-point processing power0.2358 TFLOPS6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache48 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA5.38.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 20 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Jetson Nano GPU has 250% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Nano GPU and RTX A2000 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson Nano GPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20 votes

Rate Jetson Nano GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Jetson Nano GPU or RTX A2000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.