RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Jetson Nano GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.39
Power efficiencyno data44.47
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM20BAD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2019 (6 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282816
Core clock speed640 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed921 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate14.74187.4
Floating-point processing power0.2358 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs1688
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA5.38.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 20 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 70 Watt

Jetson Nano GPU has 600% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Nano GPU and RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson Nano GPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU
Jetson Nano GPU
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 19 votes

Rate Jetson Nano GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 52 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Jetson Nano GPU or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.