GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Jetson Nano GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM20BTU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMarch 2019 (6 years ago)25 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128896
Core clock speed640 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed921 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate14.7471.40
Floating-point processing power0.2358 TFLOPS2.285 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1656
L1 Cache48 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.11.2
CUDA5.37.5

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 20 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 31 Watt

Jetson Nano GPU has 210% lower power consumption.

MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Nano GPU and GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU
Jetson Nano GPU
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20 votes

Rate Jetson Nano GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Jetson Nano GPU or GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.