Tesla PG500-216 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking621not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.21no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameDG1GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date31 October 2020 (4 years ago)26 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685120
Core clock speed300 MHz1260 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate79.20441.6
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS14.13 TFLOPS
ROPs24128
TMUs48320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s1,133 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 October 2020 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has an age advantage of 11 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

Tesla PG500-216, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Tesla PG500-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook card while Tesla PG500-216 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
NVIDIA Tesla PG500-216
Tesla PG500-216

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 252 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla PG500-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.